Volume stops falling, cost does not stop rising
Permits move forward by one month. At the end of September 2026, 362,900 dwellings are authorised over a rolling twelve months, up 1.0% year on year, against 359,300 at the end of September 2025 (source: SDES, Sit@del database, metropolitan France, recent months provisional). That figure calls for two opposite readings. In year-on-year terms it is positive. In level terms it is the sixth consecutive fall since the March 2026 peak of 383,100, which is 20,200 dwellings lost in six months. Authorised living floor area, meanwhile, is down 3.8% over twelve months, at 24.28 million square metres. So slightly more dwellings are authorised, and less floor area. On cost, no pause. The BT01 all-trades index stands at 139.4 in August 2026, up 4.3% year on year, against 133.7 in August 2025 (source: INSEE, 2010 = 100). But it is in civil engineering that the energy shock reads: TP09 asphalt production reaches 138.9, 11.7% above August 2025, and TP12a energy networks 144.4, up 7.9%. Three indices from the same month, three increases ranging from 4.3% to 11.7%: there is no such thing as the cost of construction, there are as many as there are baskets. Commodities confirm the split. In October 2026, the latest closed month, copper holds 14,290 dollars a tonne, while aluminium falls 3.6% in a month, to 3,168 dollars, and lumber 4.5%, to 218.22 dollars a cubic metre.
🔍 Focus: why two indices from the same month do not say the same thing
A BT or TP index is not an inflation rate, it is a level. On a 2010 = 100 base, a BT01 at 139.4 means that the all-trades building cost basket costs 39.4% more than in 2010, not that it rose 39.4% this year. What separates the indices from one another is their composition. BT01 weights every trade, wages included, and labour cushions commodity shocks. TP09 weights asphalt production, where bitumen and heating energy make up most of the price: when crude rises, that index rises almost at once. TP12a weights energy networks, where copper rules. The consequence is very concrete. A multi-year contract carries a price revision clause tied to a named index, and the choice of that index decides who bears the increase. Two neighbouring sites, one revised on BT01 and the other on TP09, have not lived through the same year: 4.3% against 11.7%, a 7.4 point gap over twelve months. Checking which of the two your contract cites is not a legal formality, it is a margin line.
- Dwellings authorised, 12 months to September 2026: 362,900, up 1.0% year on year (source: SDES, Sit@del database, metropolitan France)
- BT01 and TP09 indices, August 2026: 139.4 (up 4.3% year on year) against 138.9 (up 11.7%) (source: INSEE, 2010 = 100)
- Commodities, October 2026: copper 14,290 dollars a tonne, aluminium 3,168 dollars, lumber 218.22 dollars a cubic metre; steel at 126.1 in August 2026 (sources: COMEX and CME futures; Eurostat, series sts_inpp_m, NACE division C24)
- Why the gap matters: a cost index is not a selling price, it is the reference of a revision clause. The 7.4 points separating BT01 from TP09 over twelve months are paid by one of the two parties to the contract.